为何印度语写作对中国学生来说很难？

以前有多位学长向我传达过“文学评论高水平很输，想要要家教们告诉他们每个大都该寄给什么就好了以及用什么语句就好了”这样的想要法，于是，流行这样一种段内揭开序幕的说法：“第一句寄给论调和真实持续性，第二句做阐释，第三句举某种程度来说，第四句概述。”因为同学们总明白没什么可寄给，所以当家教告诉他们有固定的四句话可寄给，他们普遍明白很开心了。

但这不是或许的文学评论，只要把自己置放朗读角度，我们就很容易精神到，这样的社论很或许全无劝告力。我第一印象最深的是以前有一次讲 TOEFL 文学评论（理论上揭开序幕真实持续性的浅层比学术界文学评论要求要高一些）的时候，有学长寄给这样一个话题“唯机械工程确实重新考虑浓厚兴趣还是指导岗位”，这个话题在我们学术界文学评论中其实也有，这位学长支持的是“唯机械工程确实优先重新考虑指导岗位”，他的段内揭开序幕是这么寄给的：

Students should definitely think about their career prospects, because this guarantees them a better future. （论调和真实持续性）If they don't think about the job market, they may study something that cannot get them a job. （所谓的阐释）For example, my friend Tom did not think about jobs when he picked Physics, and he is now jobless. but my friend Jake researched the job market when he picked Chemistry, and now he earns over 1 million dollars every year. （某种程度）Thus, clearly we should consider our job prospects when picking our major. （概述）

都不用想要朗读时会时会被他劝告了，朗读时会明白这个论证过程有任何道理。结尾处中列举的两个朋友的“某种程度来说”无非就是把论调重复了一遍。或许让我们无法信服的大都就是，为什么唯了化学就能寻找有钱的指导，为什么唯了物理就时会找不到指导，中间的因果关系全部缺失，时会让朗读明白这个某种程度来说莫名其妙。

示意图先给大家看一个或许的好的文学评论结尾处

题目：Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choices of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

结尾处主题是：很多人并不知道自己的浓厚兴趣是什么，因此唯机械工程重新考虑指导岗位是很正常的。但是，并不是每个朗读都能阐释为什么在我们国家，同学到高中毕业都不知道自己爱好什么是这么普遍的两件事。于是，我就有义务给潜在的朗读讲清楚，这个持续性是如何发生的，以说明了我所给的真实持续性并不是在处理事件一个偶然的周期性，而是在处理事件一个普遍存在的周期性。（否则，我的真实持续性的价值将颇高。）

Not everyone who graduates from high school knows who he/she really is. Take the Chinese high school education system for example. Everyone here studies a similar curriculum. If you focus on science and technology, you're required to take Chinese, Math, English, Physics, Chemistry and Biology, or if you focus on humanity, you will have to take Chinese, Math, English, Politics, History, and Geography. Most students are, therefore, not actually aware of other potential fields that could one day become their career. In fact, a lot of skills that could later become important assets in a profession, such as communication skills, ability to handle pressure, or physical strength, cannot be reflected at this stage. Consequently, if a student is not exceptional in any of these fields, chances are high that he/she knows neither about his/her own passion nor his/her natural gift.（全部都是在阐释为什么时会出现大比率的同学不知道自己的浓厚兴趣。）What are his/her best odds for a choice of major then? I do believe a decision based on job availability is the rational thing to do. Today, if you pick Computer Science, for example, even if you only attend a second-tier college and get an average GPA of C+ , you are still going to be popular in the job market. All the Internet startups are in desperate need of coders, so these professionals get much higher pay than fresh graduates from most other majors. It's true. the student may not enjoy his/her job，but let's be realistic. He/She will have enough money，and he/she can do fun things after work.（全部都是在阐释为什么唯择了好指导岗位的领域，即便没有浓厚兴趣，但再一结果时会太输。）

总而言之，好的文学评论没有实例；好的文学评论是并不需要呈现出一个有想像力，理性和清晰度的意识形态要；好的文学评论是在为朗读揭开序幕，而不是为自己揭开序幕；好的文学评论是一个呈现出的过程，让“不可见的”的观点“可见”。因此我们需要：

01寻找一个立足点，建立自己的观点

02恰当自己的立场，查找方面的资讯承托

03从多个角度论述，替换成点阴影，让观点愈来愈立体

04论证内部结构要清晰，让观点层次分明